I feel like what they're presenting as a new taxonomy here isn't actually new; it was already in Liu-Wei-Wong 04 ... but to be fair, they do cite it. Not sure whether new ring sig constructions here are of interest, but at the least they're attempting to clarify what is otherwise a very confusing topic:

Sign in to participate in the conversation
unidentified instance

(instance image by мøтħer ¢røω)