h/t @J9Roem on block digest #265 - there are so many headscratchers in this case (the intro sections of the article are less important, it's the details of the specific asset seizure and (non) disbursement below that are amazing):

(why do the docs, more than once, explicitly report 39.67004483 for output 1 of d81b.. when it's actually 39.67004888 ? doesn't match tx fee e.g.).

(and .. wtf is this huge mixing address 1P9R ...?!)

· · Web · 1 · 1 · 2


I just had a weird thought, probably complete rubbish, but what if they seized the guy's computer and he already had an account set up with the centralized mixer to long-term mix and so it just kept going afterwards and they didn't even know? 😂

Sign in to participate in the conversation
unidentified instance

The social network of the future: No ads, no corporate surveillance, ethical design, and decentralization! Own your data with Mastodon!